Related Tags:

CPI-M General Secretary Prakash Karat. Photo Courtesy: AP
Hyde Act will lead the path of nuke deal: CPI(M)
Sat-Aug 02, 2008
New Delhi / Press Trust of India
The CPI(M), spearheading the Left opposition to the Indo-US nuclear deal, on Saturday alleged that the safeguards agreement approved by the IAEA showed that the US Hyde Act would determine the path of the deal.
"The provisions of the Hyde Act and not the assurances made by the Indian Prime Minister in Parliament are shaping the course of the Indo-US nuclear deal through the various stages," the party said.
The CPI(M) Politburo issued the statement a day after the IAEA unanimously approved the India-specific safeguards agreement, which was hailed as "historic" by the Congress.
Other Left parties have already attacked the agreement, saying it does not recognise India's nuclear weapon status nor does it protect its interests on issues like uninterrupted fuel supply assurances.
The Left parties, which withdrew support to the Government on the issue last month, have been stridently
critical of the Hyde Act which they allege would affect India's sovereignty and strategic autonomy.
The CPI(M) noted that the safeguards agreement has made it clear that 14 Indian civilian nuclear facilities will come under perpetual IAEA safeguards from 2009.
"That the interpretation of the Indian government regarding the corrective measures mentioned in the Preamble of the Safeguards Agreement providing for a check against disruption of fuel supplies does not hold has been made clear by the IAEA," it claimed.
Citing a statement from IAEA Director General Mohamed El Baradei, the party said it implied that nuclear facilities could be withdrawn from safeguards only after they are no longer usable for any nuclear activity.
"This belies the Prime Minister's assurance in Parliament that India's civilian nuclear facilities would be put under perpetual IAEA safeguards only under the strictly reciprocal condition of uninterrupted fuel supply guarantee," it said.
Besides, CPI(M) added that neither the 123 Agreement with the United States provided any such fuel supply guarantee nor can the IAEA ensure interrupted fuel supply since the Vienna-based body is only a monitoring agency.
"The provisions of the Hyde Act and not the assurances made by the Indian Prime Minister in Parliament are shaping the course of the Indo-US nuclear deal through the various stages," the party said.
The CPI(M) Politburo issued the statement a day after the IAEA unanimously approved the India-specific safeguards agreement, which was hailed as "historic" by the Congress.
Other Left parties have already attacked the agreement, saying it does not recognise India's nuclear weapon status nor does it protect its interests on issues like uninterrupted fuel supply assurances.
The Left parties, which withdrew support to the Government on the issue last month, have been stridently
critical of the Hyde Act which they allege would affect India's sovereignty and strategic autonomy.
The CPI(M) noted that the safeguards agreement has made it clear that 14 Indian civilian nuclear facilities will come under perpetual IAEA safeguards from 2009.
"That the interpretation of the Indian government regarding the corrective measures mentioned in the Preamble of the Safeguards Agreement providing for a check against disruption of fuel supplies does not hold has been made clear by the IAEA," it claimed.
Citing a statement from IAEA Director General Mohamed El Baradei, the party said it implied that nuclear facilities could be withdrawn from safeguards only after they are no longer usable for any nuclear activity.
"This belies the Prime Minister's assurance in Parliament that India's civilian nuclear facilities would be put under perpetual IAEA safeguards only under the strictly reciprocal condition of uninterrupted fuel supply guarantee," it said.
Besides, CPI(M) added that neither the 123 Agreement with the United States provided any such fuel supply guarantee nor can the IAEA ensure interrupted fuel supply since the Vienna-based body is only a monitoring agency.
Rate This Article:
















Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Propeller
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Icerocket
Print
Comments For This Post
Post new comment