The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is considering significant measures to disrupt Google’s dominance in online search, which could potentially impact the company’s profitability and hinder its advancements in artificial intelligence (AI). Analysts suggest that any legal resolution may take years to finalize.
Proposed Divestitures and Regulations
On Tuesday, the DOJ announced it might urge a court to require Google to divest key components of its business, including the Chrome browser and the Android operating system. These actions are part of a broader strategy to address what prosecutors describe as an illegal monopoly in search services.
Among other potential remedies, the DOJ is evaluating the possibility of restricting Google from collecting sensitive user data, mandating that it share search results and indexes with competitors, allowing websites to opt out of their content being used for AI training, and requiring Google to report to a “court-appointed technical committee.”
Market Reaction and Investor Concerns
Following the DOJ’s announcement, shares of Alphabet, Google’s parent company, dropped 1.5% to $161.86. Investors have reacted cautiously amid ongoing antitrust challenges, including a recent ruling demanding Google to open its app store.
Implications for Google’s Business Model
Gil Luria, a senior software analyst, commented, “The DOJ has reverse engineered Google’s formula for success and is intent on dismantling it.” He emphasized that the proposed remedies could either compel Google to share its data or cease data collection altogether, which might bolster competitors and foster new market entrants.
Challenges in the AI Landscape
With rising competition from AI-driven startups such as OpenAI and search engine alternatives like Perplexity, analysts express concern that the proposed regulations could further complicate Google’s business operations. Bernstein analyst Mark Shmulik noted, “The last thing Google needs right now in the broader AI battle is having to fight with one hand tied behind their backs by regulators.”
Potential Beneficiaries of Regulatory Changes
Should the proposed remedies take effect, competitors like DuckDuckGo, Microsoft Bing, Meta Platforms, and Amazon could stand to gain from a more level playing field. Kamyl Bazbaz of DuckDuckGo stated, “It will require a range of behavioral and structural remedies to free the market.”
Legal Hurdles Ahead
Despite the DOJ’s ambitious proposals, some industry observers are skeptical about their feasibility. Adam Kovacevich, CEO of a tech industry trade group, remarked, “The DOJ is throwing remedy spaghetti at the wall. It might score some headlines, but it’s a legal non-starter.” He noted that broad remedies often struggle to withstand judicial scrutiny.
Investment director Russ Mould added that the potential for a forced breakup of Google has been anticipated, indicating that investors remain doubtful about such outcomes.
(INCLUDES INPUTS FROM ONLINE SOURCES)
ALSO READ: X Returns To Brazil: Musk’s Platform Resumes Operations After Judicial Compliance
