Business

USA: Abbot Penalized $500 Million By Court For Hiding Risk Associated With Infant Formula

In a major win for the affected woman, whose daughter suffered from brain damage, the US court has imposed a fine of $500 Million on Abbot Laboratories for deliberately hiding the risks associated with its premature infant formula.

On Friday, Jurors of the state court of St. Louis gave $95 million to an affected family as compensation.

In addition, the plaintiff’s lawyer Tor Hoerman also reveals, that the court awarded $400 million in punitive charges.

Meanwhile reacting to this verdict, Abbot spokesperson declared, that the company ‘strongly disagrees’ with the judgement. They also highlighted that the decision isn’t unanimous.

Issuing an emailed statement, the company said, ‘We will pursue all avenues to have the erroneous decision overturned.’

Why Abbot Is Being Asked To Pay Fine?

Recently, a case was presented in front the US Court. This case was brought on the behalf of premature baby girl who contracted necrotizing enterocolitis, or NEC, after it was fed company’s cow-milk based special formula (Abbott’s Similac Special Care 24). As a result, the baby allegedly suffered from Brain damage.

However, the trial was initiated after a month, when 1,000 such allegations were made against Abbot.

Also Read: WHO Warns Of Increasing Liver Cancer Deaths In South-East Asia Due To Hepatitis Epidemic

After winning the case, Hoerman law firm issued a statement saying, ‘Justice was served for Margo Gill and her daughter Robynn, who suffered severe, irreversible brain damage due to Abbott’s misconduct.’

Notably at the start of the trial, Lawyer claimed that Abbot didn’t warn about NEC risks in its product label. Moreover, the company didn’t even inform that due to formula’s consumption, children can potentially face brain damage or death.

What Was Abbot’s Defense?

Arguing on company’s behalf, the defense lawyer asserted that the formula didn’t cause NEC disease. The Baby was already suffering from pre-existing diseases.

The Defense lawyer in a statement also questioned the link between infant formula and NEC saying ‘There is no scientific evidence showing Abbott’s preterm infant products cause or contribute to causing NEC.’

Must Read: No Birth Control Pills For Men, Why Science Is Unable To Make It Yet?

Furthermore, it also asserted that specialized formulas or fortifiers are a part of standard care given by medical community. Besides Mother’s milk and donor’s human milk, the formula is the sole source to feed the premature baby.

Dikshaa Puri

Recent Posts

Why Trump Wants To Rename Denali To Mount McKinley In Alaska?

President-elect Donald Trump intends to rename Denali, Alaska's tallest mountain, to Mount McKinley. He hailed…

21 mins ago

TikTok’s Fate In The US: Trump Indicates Potential Reprieve

Donald Trump dropped a hint for TikTok's survival by mentioning how it played an important…

1 hour ago

Elon Musk’s ‘Save The Bureaucracy’ Joke Sparks Debate On Government Inefficiency

Elon Musk was not shy about his satire 'Save the Bureaucracy' bill, mocking legislative inefficiency.…

2 hours ago

Report Reveals Over 3,100 Native American Deaths In US Boarding Schools, Tripling Official Figures

A new report has found that more than 3,100 Native American children died in U.S.…

2 hours ago

“Rs 1 Cr Is Not Enough To Start Business”, Aditya Birla Group Chairman KM Birla, Here’s Why

n Nikhil Kamath Podcast, KM Birla stated, “Rs 1 crore is just not enough to…

2 hours ago

Monroeville Mall On Lockdown Amid Shooting Reports, Police Investigate

A large police presence was reported at Monroeville Mall on Sunday afternoon after social media…

3 hours ago