Explore
Settings

Settings

×

Reading Mode

Adjust the reading mode to suit your reading needs.

Font Size

Fix the font size to suit your reading preferences

Language

Select the language of your choice. NewsX reports are available in 11 global languages.
we-woman

Bombay HC Dismisses Plea Against Power Contract To Adani; Imposes Rs 50,000 Cost On Petitioner

The High Court dismissed a plea challenging the award of a power contract to Adani Group, observing no substantial evidence of irregularities. It imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on the petitioner for filing a frivolous petition.

Bombay HC Dismisses Plea Against Power Contract To Adani; Imposes Rs 50,000 Cost On Petitioner

The Bombay High Court on Monday dismissed a petition challenging a contract awarded by the Maharashtra government to Adani Group for supply of renewable and thermal power electricity, noting the plea was “unsubstantiated and reckless”.

A division bench of Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Amit Borkar also imposed a cost of Rs 50,000 on the petitioner – Shriraj Nageshwar Aepurwar – for the vague petition.

Aepurwar alleged the contract awarded to the Adani Group for the supply of 6,600 megawatts of renewable and thermal power was a violation of the petitioner’s fundamental right to have access to fair electricity supply at a reasonable rate.

The plea also levelled allegations against former state chief minister Eknath Shinde, who is currently the deputy CM, of having been involved in corrupt practices while awarding the contract to Adani Group.

The bench, however, refused to accept the contentions and said, “In our opinion, filing of such petitions containing unsubstantiated and reckless averments run the risk of sometimes even good causes being lost.”

The petition made “vague and unsubstantiated” assertions that the contract awarded was a scam involving government authorities, it noted.

The HC said the petition did not contain any supporting materials to show the former chief minister (Shinde) was involved in any corrupt practices.

The petitioner was not a participant in the tender process of the contract, the court added.

“The petition is bereft of any substantiating and supporting material and contains absolutely bald and vague allegations,” the HC said dismissing the plea.

The court directed the Rs 50,000 cost to be deposited by the petitioner to the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority.

(WITH AGENCY INPUT)


mail logo

Subscribe to receive the day's headlines from NewsX straight in your inbox