India

Bombay High Court Invalidates IT Rule For Fact Check Unit

On Friday, the Bombay High Court invalidated provisions that allowed the central government to establish a “fact check unit” aimed at removing online content considered fake or misleading.

This decision followed a referral verdict from a third judge, after a division bench led by Justice Gautam Patel and Justice Neela Gokhale delivered a split ruling on January 31. Justice Patel deemed the 2023 amendments to the Information Technology Rules unconstitutional, while Justice Gokhale upheld their validity.

In Friday’s ruling, Justice AS Chandurkar concurred with Justice Patel, finding Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, which was amended in 2023, to be unconstitutional.

This ruling stemmed from a series of petitions filed by stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra, the Editors Guild of India, and the Association of Indian Magazines, who argued that the amended Rules were ultra vires to Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and violated Articles 14, 19(1)(a), and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

Earlier, petitioners contended that the amendments imposed an obligation on intermediaries to make “reasonable efforts” to prevent users from publishing content identified as fake, false, or misleading by the central government’s fact-checking unit.

Also Read: Bombay HC Criticizes CBFC For Delaying In ‘Emergency’ Film Certification

Further, they also argued that the vague definition of “business of the central government” created a chilling effect. Thus, leading intermediaries to remove any flagged content to avoid losing their safe harbor protections.

Meanwhile, during the proceedings, the central government had indicated it would not activate the fact check unit until the split verdict.

Must Read: Bombay HC Proposes Committee Names For SOPs In Badlapur Minors’ Assault Case

However, after the split decision, the government reversed its stance, prompting Kamra and the associations to request Justice AS Chandurkar for a stay on notifying the fact check unit.

Following the government’s decision to proceed with notifying the fact check unit, a bench led by Chief Justice Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud stayed the implementation of the rules, citing a “prima facie case” for the stay.

The bench noted that the challenge to Rule 3(1)(b)(v) raised serious constitutional questions, particularly regarding its impact on the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a).

Dikshaa Puri

Recent Posts

KJS Cement Case: SC Refuses To Quash 2nd FIR Against Pawan Kumar Ahluwalia

The Supreme Court of India declined to intervene in a case involving Pawan Kumar Ahluwalia…

11 mins ago

Honda And Nissan Outline Ambitious Path To Merger In Industry Restructuring

Japanese car manufacturers Honda and Nissan have announced intentions to combine forces, paving the way…

19 mins ago

Lakshmi Puri Moves Delhi HC Against Saket Gokhale Over Defamation Ruling

Former United Nations Assistant Secretary-General Lakshmi Puri has filed a petition with the Delhi High…

22 mins ago

Tamil Nadu Bakery Honors Ratan Tata With A 7-Foot Ice Cake Statue Featuring His Beloved Dog Tito

A Tamil Nadu bakery unveiled a 7-foot ice cake statue of Ratan Tata with his…

27 mins ago

PV Sindhu Ties The Knot With Venkata Datta Sai In Udaipur: Viral Photos Revealed

PV Sindhu married Venkata Datta Sai in a traditional ceremony in Udaipur on December 22.…

2 hours ago

PM Modi Distributes 71,000 Appointment Letter Via Video Conference

Prime Minister Narendra Modi  on Monday distributed over 71,000 appointment letters to newly appointed government…

2 hours ago