The Delhi High Court has recently reduced the sentences of two women convicted for their involvement with the banned terrorist organization, Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP), a regional affiliate of ISIS. The court’s decision reflects a nuanced approach, considering both the nature of the crimes and the evolving role of social media platforms in facilitating terrorist activities.
Hina Bashir Beigh and Sadiya Anwar Shaikh were both sentenced for their active involvement in supporting the ISKP. Beigh, the wife of another convicted terrorist, Jahanzaib Sami, was originally sentenced to eight years in prison, while Shaikh faced a seven-year sentence. Both sentences were reduced by the court to six years each.
The women were found guilty of using encrypted social media platforms to communicate with members of ISKP and promote terrorist ideologies. The court emphasized the growing concern around the misuse of such platforms, highlighting how terrorists have been able to exploit these tools to spread violence, recruit new members, and coordinate attacks without detection.
The bench, led by Justices Prathiba M Singh and Amit Sharma, noted that both women utilized fake identities and concealed their original identities in an effort to evade detection by authorities. Their technological expertise and educational backgrounds were also mentioned as factors that facilitated their active involvement in online terror activities.
MUST READ: Srinagar Tragedy: Speeding Car Rams Into Parked Truck, Two Young Lives Lost
One of the key aspects of the Delhi High Court’s ruling was its recognition of the increasing role of encrypted social media platforms in terrorist operations. The court acknowledged that while these platforms offer privacy and freedom of expression, their misuse by individuals with malicious intent presents significant challenges to law enforcement agencies.
The court stated, “Considering the specific facts of the present case, the proliferation of crime through the internet and social media platforms cannot be ignored.” It further pointed out that the women’s ability to manipulate these platforms for spreading radical propaganda was a critical factor in their involvement with ISKP.
This ruling comes at a time when global concerns over the role of social media in promoting terrorism are at an all-time high. The Islamic State (ISIS) and its affiliates, including ISKP, have long utilized social media as a key tool for recruitment, propaganda, and incitement to violence. The rise of encrypted communication platforms, which promise privacy and security, has made it easier for terrorist groups to operate covertly, making it essential for courts to address this factor when sentencing individuals involved in such crimes.
While the court acknowledged the severity of the offense, it also took into account several mitigating factors in the women’s favor, including their educational qualifications. Beigh and Shaikh were both described as technologically adept and well-educated, which the court recognized as enabling their active involvement in the promotion of terrorism.
However, the court also made it clear that the misuse of technology for terrorism must be dealt with separately from cases involving individuals who might be unknowingly caught in criminal activities. The bench stressed that terrorism-related offenses, especially those involving the internet, must be treated with heightened scrutiny due to the sophistication and international reach of such crimes.
The Delhi High Court’s ruling marks an important step in recognizing the evolving challenges posed by terrorism in the digital age. It sends a strong message to the judiciary that the role of social media platforms in facilitating terrorist activities cannot be overlooked when sentencing individuals involved in such activities.
The case also highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to sentencing, particularly in cases involving terrorism and social media misuse. It is crucial for the courts to understand the technological and psychological aspects of online radicalization and how it may influence the extent of an individual’s involvement in terrorist activities.
As social media continues to be a dominant force in global communication, it is likely that courts worldwide will need to adapt their sentencing frameworks to better address the complexities posed by digital terrorism.
ALSO READ: Union Home Minister Amit Shah Dares Rahul Gandhi To laud Savarkar, Bal Thackeray
