The Delhi Police presented their arguments opposing the bail plea of former JNU student leader Umar Khalid in connection with the North East Delhi riots of 2020. Special Judge Sameer Bajpai of the Karkardooma Court heard the arguments, where the Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Amit Prasad asserted that Khalid had amplified his narrative as part of a larger conspiracy. Khalid, accused in the Delhi riots case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), has been in custody since September 2020.
During the proceedings, SPP Amit Prasad referred to various chat conversations involving Khalid and individuals with significant social media followings. He argued that Khalid’s interactions were part of a deliberate effort to amplify a particular narrative, implicating him in the alleged conspiracy behind the riots. Among those mentioned in Khalid’s alleged messages were political and social activist Yogendra Yadav, as well as two online news portals.
Khalid’s plea for bail cited a “change of circumstances,” including the duration of his custody. His counsel argued that individuals facing graver allegations than Khalid had been granted bail, while others allegedly involved in similar activities were not even charged by the Delhi Police. However, SPP Prasad countered these arguments, emphasizing the need to consider all events within the alleged conspiracy collectively rather than in isolation.
Prasad dismissed the notion of granting bail based on parity with other accused persons, highlighting that each case must be assessed independently. He also raised concerns about individuals on bail stalling the trial process to the disadvantage of those in custody. Prasad further alleged that Khalid had discussed mobilizing protests based on Supreme Court hearings, suggesting a lack of faith in the judiciary.
The prosecution concluded its arguments by playing an interview with Khalid’s father, where he expressed distrust in the Supreme Court, implying an attempt to shape a narrative against the judicial system. The hearing highlighted the complexities surrounding Khalid’s bail plea and the broader legal and political implications of the Delhi riots case.
