India

Gauhati HC Bans Buffalo, Bulbul Fights After PETA’s Petition

The Gauhati High Court has prohibited buffalo and bulbul fights in Assam, following a petition by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) India.

Justice Devashis Baruah quashed the Assam government’s Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), which had permitted these fights during January, citing violations of central laws and Supreme Court rulings.

Court’s Ruling

The SOP, issued on December 27, 2023, was deemed inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s 2014 judgment in Animal Welfare Board of India vs A Nagaraja. The Court agreed with PETA India’s arguments, presented by Senior Advocate Diganta Das, that these events contravened the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, and, in the case of bulbul fights, also breached the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.

Evidence of Animal Cruelty

PETA India’s investigations revealed harrowing conditions for the animals involved:

– Buffalo Fights: Terrified buffaloes were beaten, jabbed with sticks, and dragged by their nose ropes to provoke aggression. During fights, the animals locked horns and sustained severe injuries, including bloody wounds on their necks, ears, faces, and foreheads. These fights often ended when one buffalo fled in fear.
– Bulbul Fights: Protected under Schedule II of the Wildlife Protection Act, red-vented bulbuls were illegally captured, starved, and intoxicated with substances like marijuana. During the fights, hungry birds were incited to attack each other using pieces of banana as bait, enduring exhaustion and injury.

PETA India also presented evidence of fights being conducted illegally beyond the dates permitted by the SOP, further demonstrating the inherent cruelty and lack of control in such events.

Statements from PETA India

Arunima Kedia, Lead Legal Counsel for PETA India, emphasized the suffering inflicted on these animals:
“Buffaloes and bulbuls are gentle animals who feel pain and terror and do not want to be forced into bloody fights in front of jeering crowds.”

Kedia expressed gratitude to the High Court for enforcing laws that protect animals from such cruelty, adding that these fights contradict India’s cultural principles of ahimsa (non-violence) and compassion.

Broader Implications

This landmark judgment reaffirms India’s commitment to animal welfare and the enforcement of laws against cruelty. It also sets a precedent for curbing practices that exploit animals under the guise of tradition.

Court’s decision highlights the importance of compassion and adherence to legal protections, ensuring that animals are not subjected to unnecessary pain and suffering in the name of entertainment or cultural practices.

Read More: Starlink-Like Antenna, Router Seized From Insurgent Groups In Manipur

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Maha Kumbh 2025: Yogi Government To Provide Free Food For 5,000 People Every Day and Set Up Community Kitchens

The Yogi Government has announced plans to provide free meals for 5,000 devotees daily during…

12 mins ago

Delhi HC Issues Notice To ED On Bail Plea Of Sukesh Chandrasekhar’s Wife Leena Paulose

Delhi High Court sought a response from the Enforcement Directorate on the bail plea of…

15 mins ago

Air India Announces Special Discounts And Benefits For Students: Check The Eligibility

Up to 10% Discount: Enjoy a 10% discount on base fares for all flights across…

36 mins ago

R Ashwin Retirement: Will The Ace Spinner Play For Chennai Super Kings In IPL 2025?

He remained with CSK until 2015 before joining Rising Pune Supergiant in 2016, led by…

1 hour ago

Case Against Yasin Malik: SC Directs Co-Accused To File Reply On Transfer Of Trial

Supreme Court directed the co-accused in two cases involving Yasin Malik to respond to the…

1 hour ago

After Emotional Hug, Virat Kohli Pens Heartfelt Message On Ashwin’s Retirement

In an emotional message after Ashwin's retirement announcement, Kohli reflected on the last 14 years…

2 hours ago