India

One Nation, One Election: Streamlining India’s Electoral Process to Save Time and Costs

The “One Nation, One Election” proposal seeks to synchronize national and state elections across India. The objective is to streamline governance, reduce the constant political cycles, and curtail the heavy spending that accompanies separate elections. At present, elections are held at different times, which not only prolongs political uncertainty but also leads to significant financial and social costs. By holding all elections together, both time and money could be saved.

Committee Findings: Financial Impact Cannot Be Fully Quantified

A high-level committee, chaired by former President Ram Nath Kovind, was formed to evaluate the potential impacts of the One Nation, One Election plan. The committee’s findings indicate that while some of the financial consequences can be measured, a large part of the impact remains unquantifiable. The report noted, “Some of the consequences are quantifiable, but a large part cannot be quantified, like the impact of uncertainty, the disruption of a harmonious social fabric, its impact on potential investors, and circumscribing the governance structure in detracting policymakers over multiple times from their basic functioning of governance.”

Economic Impacts: Boost to GDP

One of the key highlights of the Kovind Committee’s report is the potential economic benefits of simultaneous elections. The report projected that India’s national real GDP growth could be 1.5 percentage points higher in the immediate year following simultaneous elections, compared to a year with non-simultaneous elections. To put this into perspective, in the financial year 2024, 1.5% of the GDP amounted to approximately Rs 4.5 lakh crore. This figure is nearly half of the public expenditure on health and one-third of that on education.

READ MORE: Supreme Court Criticizes CBI for Allegations Against West Bengal Judiciary: Petition Withdrawn Amid Concerns

Fiscal Deficit Concerns

However, the report also raised concerns about a possible rise in the fiscal deficit surrounding simultaneous elections. It was estimated that the fiscal deficit might increase by 1.28% in the two years both prior to and following elections. This increase is attributed to higher public spending during election cycles.

Rise in Government Expenditure

The data from the report revealed a 17.67% increase in government expenditure following simultaneous elections, compared to non-simultaneous election episodes. Interestingly, the spending pattern is skewed toward capital expenditure rather than revenue, indicating that the funds are more likely to be invested in long-term infrastructure projects, aligning with evidence of higher economic growth during these periods.

Impact on Investments: Reduced Uncertainty

Frequent elections contribute to uncertainty, particularly in terms of investments. The report estimated that the ratio of Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF) to GDP is about 0.5 percentage points higher during simultaneous election episodes. This suggests that having synchronized elections could provide more stable economic conditions, encouraging investment.

Inflation: Decrease Post Simultaneous Elections

The analysis showed that inflation tends to decrease during both simultaneous and non-simultaneous election periods, but the drop is more significant when elections are held together. The difference in inflation reduction is estimated to be around 1.1 percentage points, contributing to a more favorable economic environment post-elections.

Overall Economic Gains

The findings present a clear economic advantage for One Nation, One Election. According to the report, simultaneous elections result in higher average real GDP growth at both the national and state levels, alongside a decrease in inflation compared to non-simultaneous elections. These combined factors suggest a healthier and more stable economic outlook post-election.

The High Cost of Elections

India’s election process is an expensive affair. A parliamentary panel revealed that the Election Commission of India spends over Rs 4,500 crore to conduct elections for the Lok Sabha and various state assemblies. This estimate excludes the additional spending by political parties and individual candidates, which significantly raises the total cost.

For the 2024 Lok Sabha elections alone, the Centre for Media Studies estimated that India spent Rs 1.35 lakh crore—double the amount spent during the 2014 elections. The financial burden of holding separate elections continues to be a concern, further highlighting the potential savings of One Nation, One Election.

What Lies Ahead: The Road to Implementation

The Kovind Committee submitted its detailed 18,000-page report to President Droupadi Murmu on March 14, 2024, outlining a plan to introduce One Nation, One Election by 2029. For this plan to materialize, certain state legislative assemblies would either need to extend their terms or dissolve early to align with the national election schedule.

The report recommends 18 constitutional amendments to make this possible. Key changes would include amendments to Article 83, which governs the term of Parliament, and Article 172, which regulates the term of state assemblies. Moreover, local elections would need to be synchronized as well. The report proposed a new Article 324A, which would allow for simultaneous elections for panchayats and municipalities, creating a more unified election system across all levels of government.

Coordination and Challenges

Implementing One Nation, One Election would require significant coordination between the central and state governments, as well as the Election Commission of India (ECI). Additionally, a common voter roll and a standardized voter identification system would need to be developed to ensure consistency and efficiency across all elections.

If successfully implemented, the One Nation, One Election proposal could reshape India’s electoral landscape. While the economic benefits seem clear, there are still challenges to be addressed, including political consensus and the logistical hurdles of conducting synchronized elections at such a massive scale. Nonetheless, this reform has the potential to reduce election costs, streamline governance, and create a more unified and efficient electoral process for the country.

ALSO READ:  PM Modi Attends National ‘PM Vishwakarma’ Programme Exhibition In Wardha

Srishti Mukherjee

Recent Posts

Next To Impossible: Medics Battle To Evacuate Gaza Hospital Amid Escalating Violence

Israel has ordered the evacuation of one of the last partially functioning hospitals in northern…

18 mins ago

Bears vs Lions Week 16: How To Watch, Stream, And Listen To The Game

The Chicago Bears (4-10) host the Detroit Lions in Week 16 at Soldier Field. Catch…

52 mins ago

Christmas Storm Alert: Rain, Wind, And Flood Risks For Washington’s Holiday Week

Washington will experience a stormy Christmas week with rain, gusty winds, and flood warnings impacting…

1 hour ago

MTV Hustle 4 Crowns Lashcurry As The Ultimate Hip-Hop Champion

Lashcurry emerged as the winner of MTV Hustle 4: Hip Hop Don’t Stop, claiming the…

2 hours ago

Dahi For Christmas? Indian Employee’s Secret Santa Gift Becomes Talk Of The Office For All Wrong Reasons

An Indian employee's unique Secret Santa gift, a tub of dahi, has taken the office…

2 hours ago

ISRO-NASA Set To Launch ‘NISAR’ Satellite In 2025: All About The Joint Mission

At the heart of NISAR is Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) technology, which enables the satellite…

2 hours ago