This decision underscores the significance of the Places of Worship Act, 1991, in maintaining the status quo amid ongoing legal disputes.
In a notable procedural change, the Supreme Court of India, under Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, has stopped the practice of oral mentioning for urgent hearings. From now on, advocates seeking immediate court listings must submit their requests in writing.
On Tuesday, CJI Khanna outlined the new protocol in open court, emphasizing that urgent listings will no longer be accepted through oral requests. Instead, lawyers must use email or provide written slips explaining the reasons for urgency.
“From now on, no oral or written mentions will be allowed in person. Only email or written slips are acceptable, with clear statements on the urgency,” CJI Khanna announced.
This policy change moves away from the practice under former Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, where lawyers could orally mention cases for urgent hearings. Previously, this approach enabled swift interventions in time-sensitive matters, such as stays on demolitions or preventing imminent arrests.
Scammers trick people by reaching out through social media, such as Telegram or WhatsApp, promising…
Kristen Fischer, a mother of three, took to Instagram to highlight eight key reasons why…
The arrests were carried out by a special team from the Ernakulam Town South Police…
The crew of four will conduct a range of scientific experiments, including growing mushrooms in…
Boston had a tough opening series against the Texas Rangers, going 1-3 due to inconsistent…
French far-right leader swiftly denounced the verdict as “a political move” designed to block her…