ALSO READ: Indian Railways Achieves Historic Milestone By Transporting 3 Crore Passengers In A Single Day
On November 5, 2024, Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud delivered a historic judgment that rekindled the democratic spirit enshrined in India’s Constitution and struck a significant blow to socialist ideologies embedded in its fabric. This ruling redefined the interpretation of the “Right to Private Property,” a right crucial to both individual liberty and economic growth. The decision has implications for the property rights of all Indian citizens and marks a significant shift in India’s economic and judicial landscape.
In India’s original Constitution, the right to private property was protected under two key articles:
These articles provided the foundation for private ownership in India, recognizing it as a fundamental democratic right. Private property rights played a pivotal role in launching the Industrial Revolution globally, underpinning the capitalist system that spurred economic growth. However, these rights in India were curtailed in 1978 with the 44th Constitutional Amendment, which erased Articles 19(1)(f) and 31 from the Constitution, downgrading the right to property from a fundamental right to merely a statutory right under Article 300A.
The trajectory toward this fundamental shift began with the First Constitutional Amendment in 1951, introduced by then-Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. This amendment aimed to address the vast disparities in land ownership caused by the zamindari system, wherein a small elite owned extensive tracts of land. Nehru, guided by socialist principles, was determined to redistribute wealth and dismantle the zamindari system. He introduced laws to redistribute land through Land Settlement Acts and safeguarded these acts in the new Ninth Schedule of the Constitution, preventing judicial review of any laws placed within it.
The Ninth Schedule’s introduction sparked intense debate: why wasn’t land redistribution addressed in the original 1950 Constitution? Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the principal architect of the Constitution, intentionally avoided embedding economic ideologies like socialism or capitalism within its framework. He believed that such structures would infringe upon the liberty of individuals, leaving them beholden to a specific economic ideology. In contrast, Nehru’s vision was to use the Constitution to embed socialist principles to drive social equality. This ideological tension set the stage for further amendments and culminated in the 44th Amendment that removed the right to property as a fundamental right.
The 44th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1978 marked a major shift. The amendment, passed under the Janata Party government, deleted Articles 19(1)(f) and 31, replacing them with Article 300A, which framed the right to property as a mere legal right. This downgrade meant that private property could be taken by the government without the robust protections previously available to property owners. This amendment resolved the contradiction between socialist policies favoring land redistribution and constitutional protections for private property.
The ambiguity around property rights persisted even after the 44th Amendment. In 1977, Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer highlighted Article 39(b) of the Directive Principles of State Policy, which emphasized the distribution of community resources to serve the “common good.” Justice Iyer argued that private property could be interpreted as part of community resources, making it liable for redistribution.
This interpretation was cemented in the Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Co. vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. case of 1983, in which the Supreme Court ruled that private property could be acquired by the state if it served the larger interests of the community. The case established a precedent that private ownership was subordinate to the state’s control, eroding the sanctity of personal ownership.
In 1997, the Mafatlal Industries vs. Union of India case called for a re-evaluation of the 1983 ruling. The Supreme Court recommended that a larger nine-judge bench reexamine whether private property could indeed be treated as community resources. After nearly three decades, this long-pending review finally began in April 2024, with CJI Chandrachud leading an eight-judge bench to revisit the issue of private property under Article 39(b).
On November 5, 2024, CJI Chandrachud and his fellow justices delivered a landmark judgment that restored the right to private property in a redefined form. The court asserted that private property cannot be indiscriminately taken by the state under the guise of community resources. The judgment made it clear that while certain private resources might be appropriated in rare instances for the common good, the default presumption favors private ownership, with compensation as an essential prerequisite.
The ruling aligns India with its evolving economic landscape, where socialism is tempered with the liberalization policies adopted since the 1990s. Recognizing the harm caused by Justice Iyer’s rigid interpretation of socialism, the court acknowledged that economic ideology must evolve to reflect the times. Justice Chandrachud emphasized the need for a Constitution that respects private ownership and fosters a stable environment for individuals and businesses.
This landmark decision affects all segments of Indian society, from wealthy business owners to small-scale landowners:
With this ruling, CJI Chandrachud and the Supreme Court have revitalized the right to private property in India, restoring a fundamental aspect of individual liberty. While this right is not yet reinstated as a fundamental right, the ruling offers stronger protections and signals a shift away from socialist-era property controls. For many, the decision represents a long-awaited acknowledgment of the importance of private ownership in a modern, democratic society.
Sriram Krishnan has held leadership roles in product teams at major tech companies, including Microsoft,…
A massive 100-kg Burmese python, weighing 17 feet, was rescued from Assam University’s Girls Hostel…
Every year on December 23, India celebrates National Farmers’ Day, or Kisan Diwas, to honor…
Over the years, Abhijeet lent his voice to a wide range of Bollywood stars, including…
Kisan Diwas, celebrated on December 23, stands as a tribute to the nation’s farmers and…
Elon Musk, known for his significant political contributions, donated $238.5 million to Trump’s presidential campaign—the…