A recent paper published in the journal Science Advances has come under fire for its report on excess mortality in India during 2020. According to the study, India experienced 1.19 million more deaths than the previous year, a figure that has been widely criticized as a gross and misleading overestimate.
Critics have pointed out that the methodology used by the authors is fundamentally flawed, leading to erroneous conclusions. The claims made in the paper have been described as inconsistent and unexplainable, casting serious doubts on the reliability of the findings.
Experts have emphasized that the actual all-cause excess mortality in India for 2020 is significantly lower than the 1.19 million deaths reported by the study. This discrepancy has raised questions about the study’s alignment with established patterns of COVID-19 mortality, further undermining its credibility.
One of the major points of contention is the study’s failure to adequately consider India’s robust Civil Registration System (CRS). The CRS recorded a substantial increase in death registrations in 2020, achieving over 99% coverage. This increase is not solely attributable to the pandemic, suggesting that the excess mortality figures presented in the study may be exaggerated.
The debate over the accuracy of the Science Advances paper highlights the importance of rigorous methodology and accurate data interpretation in understanding the true impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the discussion continues, it is clear that more reliable and comprehensive studies are needed to provide a clearer picture of the pandemic’s toll on India.
MUST READ: Massive Fires Engulf Two Oil Tankers Near Singapore, Prompting Extensive Rescue Operations