OpenAI’s latest AI-generated images, inspired by the iconic animation style of Studio Ghibli, have sparked a legal debate, with a lawyer suggesting the Japanese animation studio may have grounds to sue. Rob Rosenberg, founder of Telluride Legal Strategies, told Futurism that OpenAI could face legal challenges under the Lanham Act, a federal law that protects trademarks and prevents consumer deception.

Why Studio Ghibli May Have a Case

According to Rosenberg, Studio Ghibli could argue that OpenAI is leveraging its signature artistic identity in a way that might mislead consumers into believing the AI-generated images are endorsed by the studio. This could amount to trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, which governs false advertising and unfair competition.

“Ghibli could argue that by converting user photos to ‘Ghibli-style,’ OpenAI is trading off the goodwill of Ghibli’s trademarks,” Rosenberg explained. If a court finds that OpenAI’s actions cause consumer confusion or dilute Studio Ghibli’s brand, the company could be held liable.

Copyright Infringement Concerns

Beyond trademark violations, OpenAI may also face scrutiny over potential copyright infringement. Studio Ghibli could claim that OpenAI used its copyrighted works to train its AI models without permission. While OpenAI argues that training AI on copyrighted materials falls under “fair use,” this remains a heavily debated legal gray area.

The recent surge of AI-generated images mimicking Studio Ghibli’s style has fueled ethical concerns over AI’s impact on human artists. OpenAI was forced to impose restrictions after CEO Sam Altman admitted that their GPUs were “melting” due to high demand.

Potential Implications for AI and Copyright Law

The outcome of any legal action remains uncertain, but if a court rules against OpenAI, it could set a precedent for AI-generated content and copyright law.

“If OpenAI were marketing its platform as a place where consumers could transform their photos into ‘Ghibli-style’ anime, that fact would weigh more strongly in favor of a court finding that OpenAI’s conduct violated the Lanham Act,” Rosenberg noted.

If courts reject OpenAI’s fair use defense, AI developers might be required to compensate copyright holders and credit them for influencing AI-generated content. This could reshape how AI companies train their models and use copyrighted material.

Impact on Studio Ghibli’s Business Model

Legal experts also warn that OpenAI’s AI-generated images could impact Studio Ghibli’s ability to monetize its signature art style.

“If Studio Ghibli ever wanted to launch its own tool allowing fans to transform photos into its signature style, OpenAI’s update has essentially taken that business opportunity away,” Rosenberg pointed out.

As AI-generated content continues to evolve, legal battles like this could define the future of AI, copyright law, and artistic ownership. For now, whether Studio Ghibli will take legal action remains to be seen, but the debate over AI and intellectual property is far from over.

ALSO READ: Motorola Edge 60 Fusion Launched In India: Check Price, Features, And Specifications