Elon Musk’s ambitious $1 million-a-day giveaway to registered voters is facing legal challenges, with claims that it constitutes an illegal lottery. The controversy emerged during a hearing in Pennsylvania, just a day before a pivotal election that features a closely contested race between Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris and former Republican President Donald Trump.
Musk, a prominent supporter of Trump, is backing the Republican candidate through his political action committee.
Since October 19, Tesla’s CEO Musk has been awarding $1 million daily to randomly selected voters who sign a petition advocating for free speech and gun rights. However, this initiative has drawn ire from Pennsylvania’s Democratic District Attorney, Lawrence Krasner, who filed a lawsuit on October 28 seeking to halt the giveaway. Krasner characterized the initiative as an illegal lottery that violates state consumer protection laws.
Legal Arguments Presented
During the hearing, Krasner’s lawyer, John Summers, presented arguments to Judge Angelo Foglietta, asserting that Musk’s giveaway does not comply with Pennsylvania’s lottery regulations. “The law is pretty clear about what constitutes a lottery, and this doesn’t align with any lawful definition in Pennsylvania,” Summers stated, emphasizing the illegality of the initiative under state law.
On the other side, Musk’s legal representation, led by attorney Chris Gober, contended that Krasner’s actions were politically motivated. Gober claimed that the lawsuit was an attempt to suppress Musk’s support for Trump. “We don’t allow our rights to be trampled upon by partisan agendas masquerading as legal arguments. Truth will not be bullied, and neither will my client,” Gober asserted outside the courtroom.
Targeted States And Election Implications
Musk’s giveaway is specifically aimed at registered voters in seven crucial states anticipated to determine the outcome of the election: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. To date, Musk’s America PAC has awarded $1 million prizes to 16 individuals, with the final prize set to be announced on November 5.
Krasner’s lawsuit further alleges that the selection of winners may not be as random as advertised, citing instances where recipients attended pro-Trump rallies. In court, Summers raised concerns about Musk’s failure to disclose essential details, such as the selection process and the odds of winning.
The Stakes In Pennsylvania
As the largest city in Pennsylvania, Philadelphia plays a critical role in this election cycle. With 19 electoral votes at stake, the state is viewed as a battleground essential for either candidate’s path to victory. The political implications of Musk’s giveaway could potentially sway voter sentiment in a race expected to be decided by a narrow margin.
Musk and his political committee sought to transfer the case to federal court, arguing that it raised questions surrounding free-speech rights and potential election interference. However, U.S. District Judge Gerald Pappert ruled that the case should remain in state court, leading to the scheduling of a hearing by Judge Foglietta on the matter.
MUST READ | US Election: Trump Delivers Remarks At His Final North Carolina Rally
