Categories: World

Alabama’s Largest Hospital Halts IVF Amid SC says frozen embryos are children

The largest hospital in Alabama, USA, has stopped using vitro fertilization after the state’s supreme court issued a landmark ruling declaring that frozen embryos qualify as “children.”

The Alabama Supreme Court’s decision to declare frozen embryos to be children and to hold anyone accountable for inadvertently destroying them has sparked a new controversy in the US. Following the court’s decision, the hospital in the southern US state decided to stop offering in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments out of concern that they might face criminal charges.

The University of Alabama at Birmingham’s health system announced that it will keep taking eggs out of women’s ovaries. It did state, though, that they would stop the next step of the IVF procedure. The eggs are then fertilized with sperm in the following stage before being inserted into the uterus.

“We are saddened that this will impact our patients’ attempt to have a baby through IVF,” said the leading state medical provider, in a statement.

“But we must evaluate the potential that our patients and our physicians could be prosecuted criminally or face punitive damages for following the standard of care for IVF treatments,” it added.

What was the lawsuit and what was the decision made by the court?

The case originated from a wrongful death lawsuit that three couples filed in 2020 following the loss of their embryos at a fertility clinic. Someone had gone into the embryo storage area, handled the cells, and unintentionally dropped them. The embryos were destroyed as a result. The couples also filed lawsuits under the state’s Wrongful Death of a Minor Act against the Mobile Infirmary Association and the Center for Reproductive Medicine. The law covers foetuses, but it does not mention embryos created through in vitro fertilization specifically.

The Alabama Supreme Court, however, decided that frozen embryos qualified as “children” and offered the couples support in their decision. As per the court’s ruling, “all unborn children, regardless of their location” were covered by the wrongful death law.

Chief Justice Tom Parker wrote, concurring with the majority’s view: “All human beings bear the image of God even before birth, and their lives cannot be destroyed without eroding his glory.” Even the couples who filed the case actively sought out the procedure; the ruling does not limit or outlaw IVF.

Sagarika Gautam

Recent Posts

Liquor Shortage Or Rumors? What Really Happened On The Surat-Bangkok Air India Express Flight

Air India Express flight from Surat to Bangkok faced rumors of a liquor shortage, while…

2 mins ago

Since 1902, Jewish Bakery Producing Christmas Cake Made By Muslims: Visit The Only Bakery In Kolkata

Christmas in Kolkata is an experience deeply embedded in the city's culture, transcending religious boundaries…

10 mins ago

Is Justin Baldoni Addicted To Porn? Actor’s Past Comments Resurface Amid Blake Lively Allegations

According to Lively’s lawsuit, Baldoni allegedly continued his inappropriate behavior even after being cautioned during…

19 mins ago

Who Is Oscar Jenkins? Australian Man Captured In Ukraine By Russian Soldiers

Australian officials are investigating a video showing Melbourne man Oscar Jenkins, who appears to have…

1 hour ago

Kichcha Sudeep Using English Title For New Movie Sparks Backlash, Actor Gets Furious While Defending The Move

Apart from Max, Kichcha Sudeep is working on two yet-to-be-titled projects, as well as Billa…

1 hour ago

Pakistan Rewrites History After 1991, 3-0 Whitewash Against South Africa

Pakistan’s victory in the third ODI was powered by a brilliant century from Saim Ayub,…

1 hour ago