Ernst & Young (EY) recently took the drastic step of terminating dozens of employees in the United States for participating in multiple online training sessions concurrently during the firm’s learning week held earlier this year. This action, reported by the Financial Times, was deemed an ethical breach according to the company’s guidelines.
“Our core values of integrity and ethics are at the forefront of everything we do. Appropriate disciplinary action was recently taken in a small number of cases where individuals were found to be in violation of our global code of conduct and US learning policy,” stated EY in an official communication. The terminations, which occurred last week, have ignited a heated debate among employees regarding business ethics, multitasking, and the boundaries of acceptable workplace behavior.
No Warning Prior to Termination
Following their dismissal, several affected employees spoke with the Financial Times, asserting that they had not received any prior warnings against the practice of attending multiple training courses. One individual recounted, “Their emails marketing EY Ignite actually encouraged us to join as many sessions as our schedule allowed.” They added, “We all work with three monitors. I was hoping to hear new ideas that I could bring to the table to separate myself from others.”
Another former employee described the firm’s environment as one that promotes multitasking, saying, “If you are forced to bill 45 hours a week and do many more hours of internal work, how can it not?” This sentiment suggests that the company’s expectations may have inadvertently encouraged the behavior that led to the firings.
Comparative Practices Raise Questions
The dismissals have led to further criticism as employees point out perceived hypocrisy within the firm. A third former employee noted, “I know a partner who will do two (client) calls and switch their camera on and off depending on who he is talking to. If this is unethical, then that is unethical, too.” Such statements highlight a potential double standard in the enforcement of company policies.
EY labeled the terminations as “appropriate disciplinary action,” emphasizing that attending multiple courses at the same time constituted a violation of its ethical standards. However, some employees are calling the response excessively harsh.
Internal Reaction
Criticism of EY’s actions has surfaced from various employees, with one describing the firm’s response as “just bizarre.” They continued, “Perhaps reduce their rating, deduct bonus, or even delay promo, but simply terminating them effective immediately is just cruel… If this was so important, then implement better systems.” This perspective reflects a growing dissatisfaction among staff regarding how disciplinary measures are enforced.
In light of the controversy, EY has revised its guidance regarding training events, mandating that employees “be present for all content and class interactions.” The new directive aims to clarify expectations around participation in training sessions moving forward.
Importantly, reports indicate that the dismissed employees did not receive severance packages, adding to the discontent surrounding the firings.
ALSO READ: Justin Trudeau Faces Resignation Calls from Liberal Party: Will He Step Down?
