Explore
Settings

Settings

×

Reading Mode

Adjust the reading mode to suit your reading needs.

Font Size

Fix the font size to suit your reading preferences

Language

Select the language of your choice. NewsX reports are available in 11 global languages.
we-woman
Advertisement · Scroll to continue

How Will Serbia Be Affected By The Populist Prime Minister’s Resignation?

Serbia's prime minister resigns amid anti-corruption protests, raising questions about the country's political future and demands for government transparency.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue
How Will Serbia Be Affected By The Populist Prime Minister’s Resignation?


Serbia’s populist prime minister, Miloš Vučević, has resigned in an attempt to calm political tensions after months of anti-corruption protests. The protests began in November, following the collapse of the outdoor roof of a train station in Novi Sad, which killed 15 people. This disaster became a flashpoint for broader dissatisfaction with Serbia’s increasingly authoritarian rule and demands for greater government transparency.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

How Did the Protests Begin?

Since the roof collapse on November 1, Serbia has been gripped by near-daily protests. Led by students from several state universities, the demonstrations have ranged from 15-minute traffic blockades at 11:52 am, the exact time the concrete canopy came crashing down, to halting classes across the country by camping inside faculties. The students’ demands have been straightforward: they want full transparency on what caused the roof collapse and are calling for those responsible to be brought to justice.

In a country beset by widespread corruption and where few feel that state institutions work in the interests of citizens, the students’ call soon caught on. The small gatherings swiftly grew, as residents from all walks of life began joining in by the thousands. Waving banners depicting a bloodied hand—an image that protesters said symbolized the government’s responsibility in the collapse—those in the streets were joined by opposition parties and civic groups who linked the roof’s collapse to allegedly shoddy construction resulting from corruption and nepotism. The government has denied these allegations.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

In recent weeks, the protests have been marred by incidents, including two occasions in which drivers rammed into the crowds, resulting in two women being injured.

The protests have continued to spread, taking place in more than 100 cities and towns and drawing increasing support from members of the judiciary, teachers, private businesses, and the general public. Showing little sign of slowing, the largely peaceful protests pose the most significant challenge in years to the increasingly autocratic rule of Serbia’s populist president, Aleksandar Vučić, and his ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS), both of whom have faced accusations of curbing democratic freedoms in Serbia.

After a record 100,000 people turned out to protest in Belgrade on December 22, Vučić said Serbia’s special forces would “throw them around in six to seven seconds.” The threat appears to have been mostly bluster, as security forces have so far not been used to break up the protests. Instead, the protests were met with limited concessions from the government, which declassified some documents related to the station collapse. The disaster happened soon after the station was renovated by a Chinese-led consortium. Thirteen people have been charged over the disaster.

On Monday, hours after tens of thousands of people staged a day-long blockade of a major intersection in Belgrade, the president addressed the nation, defending his government’s response to the tragedy and promising to launch a dialogue with the protesters.

Vučević said he made the decision to resign after a female student in Novi Sad was taken to hospital following an attack by assailants allegedly from the SNS party. Prosecutors later said four people were detained. “It is my appeal for everyone to calm down the passions and return to dialogue,” Vučević told a news conference on Tuesday. The mayor of Novi Sad, Milan Đurić, was also set to resign on Tuesday, said Vučević.

The outgoing prime minister linked the protests to foreign interference, without providing any evidence. “I can never justify or understand many of these protests, blockades of lives, of roads and the freedom of movement of other citizens,” he said. The resignation of Vučević—who was mayor of Novi Sad when the train station renovations began—appeared to be an attempt to “buffer” public anger about the tragedy, the journalist Slobodan Georgiev told N1 television. “They have been in a freefall since the Novi Sad tragedy,” he said.

What’s Next for Serbia?

On Tuesday, pro-government media in Serbia said Vučić would attend a cabinet session in the evening to decide whether to appoint a new prime minister designate or call early elections. The decision needs to be made within 30 days. The president was probably hoping the resignation would be enough to quell dissent and allow him to bring the protests under control, said Marta Szpala, a senior fellow at the Centre for Eastern Studies in Warsaw.

“Alternatively, he can call a snap election, seeking to regain control of the narrative and take advantage of a decentralized and very diverse social movement behind the protests,” she said. The timing of a snap election would probably work in Vučić’s favor, said Szpala. “He would hope to capitalize on the fact that there is no strong, united political structure in place to challenge his rule, as the opposition was expecting the next vote to be in 2027.”

Opposition parties have said they would insist on a transitional government that would create conditions for a free and fair election. Vučić’s populists have faced accusations of irregularities during past elections. Branimir Jovančićević, a longstanding member of the opposition Democratic Party and former member of the national assembly from 2022 to 2024, said he doubted that the resignation of Vučević—largely considered to be subordinate to the country’s president—would be enough to halt the protests.

“If the president thinks that by replacing one, essentially, unimportant figure … [he] will solve the problem … he is deeply mistaken,” Jovančićević told. Others pointed to the wider impact of the protests, suggesting that they could be a sign of shifting political tides in the Balkan country.

“Reportedly, even judges—prominent state employees—left the courthouses to support passing protesters,” Edward Joseph, a former US diplomat at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, wrote on social media this week. “The fear factor is gone. Even in a degraded Balkans democracy, the people still have agency and can still demand accountability.”


Advertisement · Scroll to continue

mail logo

Subscribe to receive the day's headlines from NewsX straight in your inbox